C/2001
K5 (LINEAR) was reported as an asteroid on May 17th 2001 but was placed on the
NEO confirmation page as its movement was unusual. On May 27th 2002 the Tichas
at Klet noticed that the asteroid was slightly difuse and thus a comet. Within
a few horas of the Klet observations Tim Spahr also found the object to be
cometary in appearance.
Examination
of the MPC archive also found images taken by LINEAR on April 30th. The comet
was magnitude 16.7 when discovered and at approximately 6AU from the Sun. The
comet is dynamically new with a perihelion at 5.18AU on October 11th 2002. The
nominal aphelion distance is approximately 3 light years.
Despite
the large perihelion distance the comet has maintained a well-developed coma
and still shows a quite large and active coma in April 2003.
The light curve
There
is considerable dispersion in the light curve although the reason for this is
not at all clear. The comet appears to have outburst in Spring 2002 and to have
declined steadily from that maximum since then.
We
can see that the rate of increase of brightness is very fast. This despite the
fact that as the comet approaches and gets larger the small 10" aperture
loses light.
Nominally
the absolute magnitude of the comet is extremely bright (-7.7), this though is
due to the fact that the comet brightened very rapidly with increasing
heliocentric distance. In fact, the true size of the comet is probably somewhat
larger than average, but not exceptional.
The
minimum geocentric distance was reached when the comet was at opposition in
June 2002 and at this point it reached its brightest magnitude. Since then, as
the comet recedes from the Earth it has started to fade despite still
approaching perihelion. The reason is that the decrease in heliocentric
distance in the months approaching perihelion is very small and thus the comet
hardly brightens intrinsically. In contrast, as the comet moves away from
opposition its geocentric distance increases sufficiently to more than
compensate for the slight approach to the Sun.
When
we separate the observations by observer to attempt to understand the reason
for the discrepancies we see some unusual inconsistencies.
Little
difference is seen between the total magnitude estimates (apertures up to
30") and the estimates in the standard 10" aperture. In fact, some
"CCD Total Magnitude" measures are actually fainter than the measures
in a 10" aperture. There may be some strong colour effects present in the
data.
CCD observations
in a 10 arcsecond aperture by:
CCD aperture photometry
in apertures of 0'.2, 0'.25, 0'.2, 0'.5 by:
Última actualización 12/06/2003
Por M.R.Kidger